Skip to main content

Mean Median, and Mode with R, using Country-level IQ Estimates

Reusing the code posted for Correlations within with Hofstede's Cultural Values, Diversity, GINI, and IQ, the same data can be used for mean, median, and mode. Additionally, the summary function will return values in addition to mean and median, Min, Max, and quartile values:

Example Code

 oecdData <- read.table("OECD - Quality of Life.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ",")  
 v1 <- oecdData$IQ  

 # Mean with na.rm = TRUE removed NULL avalues  
 mean(v1, na.rm = TRUE)  

 # Median with na.rm = TRUE removed NULL values  
 median(v1, na.rm = TRUE)  

 # Returns the same data as mean and median, but also includes distribution values:  
 # Min, Quartiles, and Max  
 summary(v1)  

 # Mode does not exist in R, so we need to create a function  
 getmode <- function(v) {  
   uniqv <- unique(v)  
   uniqv[which.max(tabulate(match(v, uniqv)))]  
 }  

 #returns the mode  
 getmode(v1)  

Example Results

 > oecdData <- read.table("OECD - Quality of Life.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ",")  
 + v1 <- oecdData$IQ  
 +   
 > mean(v1, na.rm = TRUE)  
 +   
 + # Median with na.rm = TRUE removed NULL values   
 + median(v1, na.rm = TRUE)  
 +   
 + # Returns the same data as mean and median, but also includes distribution values:   
 + # Min, Quartiles, and Max   
 + summary(v1)  
 +   
 + # Mode does not exist in R, so we need to create a function   
 + getmode <- function(v) {  
 +   uniqv <- unique(v)  
 +   uniqv[which.max(tabulate(match(v, uniqv)))]  
 + }  
 +   
 + #returns the mode   
 + getmode(v1)  
 +   
 [1] 99.27273  
 [1] 99.5  
   Min. 1st Qu. Median  Mean 3rd Qu.  Max.  NA's   
  92.00  98.00  99.50  99.27 101.80 106.00    3   
 [1] 98  
 >   

Sample Data

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Tree in R, with Graphs: Predicting State Politics from Big Five Traits

This was a continuation of prior explorations, logistic regression predicting Red/Blue state dichotomy by income or by personality. This uses the same five personality dimensions, but instead builds a decision tree. Of the Big Five traits, only two were found to useful in the decision tree, conscientiousness and openness.

Links to sample data, as well as to source references, are at the end of this entry.

Example Code

# Decision Tree - Big Five and Politics library("rpart") # grow tree input.dat <- read.table("BigFiveScoresByState.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ",") fit <- rpart(Liberal ~ Openness + Conscientiousness + Neuroticism + Extraversion + Agreeableness, data = input.dat, method="poisson") # display the results printcp(fit) # visualize cross-validation results plotcp(fit) # detailed summary of splits summary(fit) # plot tree plot(fit, uniform = TRUE, main = "Classific…

Chi-Square in R on by State Politics (Red/Blue) and Income (Higher/Lower)

This is a significant result, but instead of a logistic regression looking at the income average per state and the likelihood of being a Democratic state, it uses Chi-Square. Interpreting this is pretty straightforward, in that liberal states typically have cities and people that earn more money. When using adjusted incomes, by cost of living, this difference disappears.

Example Code
# R - Chi Square rm(list = ls()) stateData <- read.table("CostByStateAndSalary.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ",") # Create vectors affluence.median <- median(stateData$Y2014, na.rm = TRUE) affluence.v <- ifelse(stateData$Y2014 > affluence.median, 1, 0) liberal.v <- stateData$Liberal # Solve pol.Data = table(liberal.v, affluence.v) result <- chisq.test(pol.Data) print(result) print(pol.Data)
Example Results
Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction data: pol.Data X-squared = 12.672, df …